Sr. No

Appeal No.

Name of the Assessee

Points involved




ITA No. 5568 & 5569/M/1995 & 6448/M/1994 A.Y. 1991-92 to 1993-94

DHL Operations B.V. Netherlands

“Whether, or not, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a proper interpretation of Art. 5.5 and Art. 5.6 of the DTA (with Netherlands) and having regard to its activities, it can be said that Airfreight Ltd. was the agent of the assessee so that it can be held that the assessee had a PE in India? And if the answer is in the affirmative, whether or not the income from inbound shipments can be treated as attributable to the PE?”

Fixed on 27-7-2015


ITA 5996/M/93 ITA 1055/M/94 ITA 1056/M/94

GTC Industries Ltd.

Fixed on 13-7-2015



ITA No. 1976/Del/2006

M/s. C.L.C. & Sons Pvt. Ltd.

“Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on the value of all intangible assets falling in the category of “any other business or commercial rights”, without coherence of such rights with the distinct genusis/ category if intangible assets like know how, patents, copyrights, trade marks, licences and franchises as defined U/s 32(1) (II) of the I.T. Act.”

Fixed after the disposal of Hon’ble High Court in the case of CLC Global Ltd. which is pending before Hon’ble High Court.


ITA No. 1999 & 2000/Del/2008

M/s. National Agricultural Co-op. Mkt. Federation of India, New Delhi.

“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, where claim of damages and interest thereon is deputed by the assessee in the court of law, deduction can be allowed for the interest claimed on such damages while computing business income.”

Adjourned sine-die


ITA No. 163/ASR/2003 A.Y.1998-99

Shri Tejinder singh (HUF)

“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, consideration claimed to have been received on account of sale of jewellery etc. relating to the disclosures made under VDI Scheme, 1997, can be considered to be the income of the assessee from undisclosed sources under any of the provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961?”

Block for 6th Months.


ITANo. 3827/Del/2009 A. Y. 2006-07

M/s. Suraj Overseas (Pvt) Ltd.

“ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) erred in Law in holding that profit aggregating to Rs. 2,51,50,313/- earned by the appellant from sale of shares and securities held under discretionary assessable under the head “business income” as opposed to capital gains returned by the appellant ?”

Fixed on 6-7-2015.



ITA Nos.1548 & 1549/Kol/2009 A.Y.2003-04 & 2004-05

M/s. Instrumentarium Corporation Ltd.

1. “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, no arm’s length rate of interest was required to be charged on the loan granted by the non-resident assessee-company to its wholly owned subsidiary Indian company M/s Datex Ohmeda(Indian) Pvt. Ltd.(Datex)?”

2. “Whether, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, CBDT Circular No. 14 of 2001 [252 ITR (St.) 104] and Taxation Ruling TR 2007/1 issued by Australian Taxation Office are relevant in the context of Transfer Pricing Regulations of India, in particular to the case of the assessee? 3. “Whether, setting off of loss with future profits and not assessing the interest income in the hands of the assessee on arm’s length price will cause real loss to the Govt. exchequer?”

Adjourned sine-die.



Int. T.A. 101 & 161/Mds/2003 A.Y. 1999-2000 A.Y.2000-2001

M/s Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd., Chennai

“Whether, the amount collected from the borrowers to meet the interest tax liability could be taxed as interest under the Interest-tax Act, 1974?”

Adjourned sine die


ITA No. 2055 & 2056/Chen/2014.

Virudhnagar Dist. Central Co-operative Bank Ltd.

“Whether a co-operative society carrying on banking business with approval of the Reserve Bank of India, is liable to deduct tax under section 194A on interest paid to is members?”

Fixed on 17-7-2015.



ITA 1952/AHD/2012

Shri Himanshu V. Shah, Ahmedabad.

“Whether deduction u/s 80-IA (4)(ii), which is available to BASIC Telecom Services Providers is also available to Franchisee of such Basic Service providers also, which is only putting EPBAX system without creating infrastructure in the field of telecom?”

Adjourned sine die


ITA Nos.2668,2669 & 2670/Ahd/2012 & C.O.Nos.10, 11, 12/Ahd/2012

The People’s Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Deesa.

1.“Whether the assessee being a Co-operative Credit Society, in view of its function in providing credit facilities to its members, is into the business of banking and is it not being impeded or hit by the provisions of section 80P(4) of I.T. Act, 1961? Further, in view of section 5 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and section 2 of NABARD Act, 1981, whether this

Adjourned sine die

Co-operative Credit Society is carrying on the Banking Bank?” Business, and for all practical purposed acting like a Co-operative

2. “Whether a Co-operative Credit Society being providing credit facility to its members can be held as banking function, so as to deny the benefit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by invoking the provisions of section 80P(4)?”


ITA No. 498/AHD/2011

Claris life Science Ltd.

Whether an assessee is liable to Penalty u/s. 221(1) of the Act. In a case where though the Assessee has not paid the self assessment u/s. 140A while filing the return of Income but revises the income by filling revised return of income and pays the tax on the revised income at the time of filing of the revised return of income?”



ITA No. 18/H/2012

M/s Jagathi Publication Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad.

To hear & decide entire appeal

Adjourned Sine die


ITA no. 417 to 419/hyd/2009

M/s. Matrusri education society Hyderabad.

“Whether collection of capitation fees/donation or any money by whatever name it is called i.e. donation, building fund. Auditorium fund etc. etc, over and above the prescribed fee for admission of students y the society which was accounted for and utilised for the propose of object of the society disentitles it from claiming exemption u/s 11 or u/s 10(23C) (Vi) of the IT Act.?”

Fixed on 10-7-2015. as part-heard


ITA 1845/hyd/2014

M/s. Progressive Construction Ltd. Hyderabad

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the expenditure incurred by the assessee on construction of road on BOT basis is Capital or Revenue? If it is Capital expenditure, whether the same is eligible for depreciation at the rate applicable to building or to an intangible asset as per S.32(1)(ii) ? And, if not whether the same being Revenue expenditure is liable to be amortised over the period of concession?

Fixed on 2-7-2015.




ITA 502/Del/2012

Vireet Inv.(P) Ltd. Delhi

“Whether the expenditure incurred to earn exempt income computed u/s. 14A could not be added while computing book profit u/s. 115 JB of the Act.

Heard on 4-6-2015

Disclaimer- This list has been made on the basis of information gathered from informal and formal sources and is neither sanctioned nor authorised by the ITAT. All care and diligence has been exercised in preparing this list. Any mistakes and omissions herein cannot be ruled out. Any mistake, error or discrepancy discovered may be brought to the notice of the administrator at [email protected]. Neither the publishers nor accept any liability for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of inaccurate or incomplete information in this list. It is requested that to avoid any doubt the reader should cross-check all the contents of this list with the ITAT.

Comments are closed.