|
Quest |
|
Opinion |
|
ABC ... Querists The querist is an Association of Persons and is engaged in the business of developing and building housing projects. The querist is in the process of acquiring development rights of a land for developing housing project, the details of which are as under:
Based on the above facts, the querist has raised the following queries:
The project under consideration undoubtedly covers an area which is more than one acre. Only because the sanction of the project is given subject to the condition that a part of the said project area must be used for construction of road and after completion of the road construction the same is to be transferred to the Corporation, in no way, takes away the said area on which the road is to be constructed out of the project. The entire project covers road development as a part of the project. It must be noted that the road is also to be constructed by the querist. Only because, some part of the land is to be used for construction of the road and that such constructed road is to be handed over to the Corporation, the same being a part of the project itself and particularly that is one of the conditions required for development of the property in question for the said construction of the road, it does not cease to take away the said part of the project to be developed by the querist. As such, as the total area covered by the project is more than one acre, though a part of it is to be used to construct roads it would be a housing project covering more than one acre and, as such, the conditions of S. 80IB(10) are fulfilled and the querist will have no difficulty in claiming deduction on the profits arising out of the said housing project. This view is supported by Dept. circular no.5/2005 dated 15-7-2005 where in it was opined that area limit of the plot has to be construed with reference to the area of the site on which the housing project is construed and not with reference to the demarcation of land done by land development authority. However by way of caution the road constructed may be handed over to the Corporation after the project is completed. Now, coming to the second issue as per the provisions of S. 80-IB(10) the project in question has to be completed within four years from the date of commencement of the project. Now, the date of completion of the construction of the project is defined to be the date on which the completion certificate in respect of such housing project is issued by the local authority. Though the section uses the words “Completion Certificate,” once the construction is completed and the architect of the querist certifies that the construction is completed and the occupation certificate is obtained and only because certain modifications are to be made as per the certificate and only after carrying out those changes as required by the authority, the certificate of completion is to be issued does not mean that it is completed only when the final certificate is obtained. Once the Occupation Certificate is obtained on the basis of the completion of the project and, only because the Occupation Certificate provides that Completion Certificate will be issued after the suggested alterations or changes as suggested by the authority are to be carried out, does not mean that it is completed only when the final certificate is obtained. As such, Occupation Certificate on the basis of completion would be sufficient for the purpose of claiming that the project is complete, and only because the final certificate is obtained only on following the directions issued as per the authority are carried out and ultimately the Completion Certificate is to be issued. It cannot be said that the project is not completed. As such, in my opinion, if the Occupation Certificate is issued on the basis of completion of the construction of the project, would be the date of completion and, therefore, the date of occupation obtained on the basis of completion of the project would be sufficient compliance and the same would be considered as date of completion of the construction of the housing project for the purpose of S. 80IB(10) The next question is, whether as the querist being an Association of Persons and not a firm, the provisions of S. 194C of the Act would be applicable ? If one goes through the provisions of S. 194C, the said provisions would be applicable only to payment by specified persons. In the said specified persons, a partnership firm is included but an AOP is not included. Though there are many common features between a partnership firm and AOP, still they are not one and the same. AOP is a separate taxable entity under the provisions of the Act and, as such, the provisions of S. 194C would not be applicable to AOP. As such, the querist need not deduct tax at source in respect of its payment to the contractors. In view of the above discussion, my answers to the queries raised are as under:
|