-
Construction of Document:
Leave and Licence or Lease
It is settled law that the
title of the document is hardly conclusive. It is the substance and not the
form which has to be seen. Much importance cannot be attached to the
nomenclature of the document and the real intention of the parties is required
to be seen by perusing the contents thereof.
Smt. Raka Singal vs. Pushpa
Builders Ltd. AIR 2007 Del 222
-
Deficiency in service by
banks: Consumer Protection Act
Due to presence of white
ants/termites in bank locker currency notes, certificates and jewellery of
hirer was damaged. Bank was bound to ensure that hirers locker remained safe
in all respects. Bank was directed to pay compensation.
Union Bank of India vs. Smt.
Kanak Choudhary & Anr. AIR 2007 (NOC) 2134 (NCC)
-
Loan agreement — Public
policy
The terms of loan agreement
permitting forcible taking possession of the vehicle is opposed to public
policy. The right to take possession by force overcoming the resistance if any
and thereby igniting to a law and order situation etc. cannot be conferred by
agreement by the party who is in need and who would be agreeable to sign on
the dotted lines.
Shibi Francis vs. State of
Kerala & Anr AIR 2007 Kerala 296
-
Nominee: Insurance Act
On death of policy holder all
his legal heirs are entitled to the amount due under insurance policy in
accordance with Hindu Succession Act. Nominee alone is not entitled to the
benefit. Nominee is only entitled to receive the amount.
Smt. Somwati & Ors. vs.
Mahjpal & Ors AIR (2007) (NOC) 2538 (UTR)
-
Professional misconduct by
Chartered Accountant
The activity of Chartered
Accountant in issuing a vague certificate with the intention of persuading the
bank to grant his client a loan, amount to “other misconduct” within the
meaning of the Act read with the Regulations framed thereunder.
Council of the Institute of
C.A. of India vs. Dayal Singh F.C.A. & Anr. AIR (2007) DEL. 263
-
Public Information Officer
should give notice to third party if he intends to disclose information
relating to third party
The third party is entitled
to get written notice of request of applicant (who is seeking information) and
get on opportunity of personal hearing before disclosure of information from
the Public Information Officer.
Reliance Inds. Ltd. vs.
Gujarat State Information Commission & Ors. AIR 2007 Gujarat 203
-
Precedent — Article 141 of
Constitution of India
Judgment is not to be read as
statute. It must be construed upon reading the same as a whole. Ratio
therefrom is required to be culled out from reading the same in its entirety
and not only a part of it.
Smt. Sunita Jain & Ors vs.
Kunwar Singh & Or AIR 2007 (NOC) 1893 (MP)
-
Recovery of loan liability of
principal debtor and surety is always joint and co-extensive
The liability of the
principal and surety is always joint and co-extensive. Section 128 of the
Contract Act lays down that the liability of the surety is co-extensive with
that of the principal debtor unless it is otherwise provided by the contract.
Such liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the liability of the
principal debtor to pay the entire amount if the liability is immediate and
the creditor can proceed against the principal debtor or against the sureties.
A.N. Poonnappan vs. Kerala
Financial Corpn & Anr. AIR 2007 Kerala 234 (FB)
-
Tribunal must be manned by
person of proven integrity and any doubt about person’s integrity should be
considered for disqualification
It is only persons with
unblemished record and high integrity who alone should be allowed to occupy
the posts of Tribunal Member. Any adverse reference against the officer,
specifically about integrity, even if it be a doubt must necessarily result in
such officer being denied appointment to a quasi-judicial post. The Tribunals
are part of judicial process and administration of justice over which High
Court exercise the supervisory jurisdiction. The Court held that such
Tribunals must be manned by persons of proven integrity and any doubt about a
person’s integrity, should be considered as a disqualification.
Ramesh Motiram Ramchandi vs.
UOI 2007 (216) ELT 192 (Bom)
-
Valuation of shares
Valuation of shares is a
technical and complex issue which may be appropriately left to the wisdom of
the experts, having regard to the many imponderables which enter the process
of valuation of shares. If the valuer adopts the method of valuation
prescribed, or in the absence of any prescribed method, adopts any recognized
method of valuation, his valuation cannot be assailed unless it is shown that
the valuation was made on a fundamentally erroneous basis, or that a patent
mistake had been committed, or the valuer adopted a demonstrably wrong
approach or a fundamental error going to the root of the matter. Valuation of
shares is a technical and complex problem which can be appropriately left to
the consideration of experts in the filed of accountancy.
G. L. Sultania & Anr vs. SEBI
& Ors AIR 2007 SC 2172
|